Earthquake scan
Author: m | 2025-04-24
Listen to Earthquake by Scan X on Deezer. Earthquake, Earthquake, Earthquake
Stream Earthquake by Scan X
Last Updated:November 15, 2024, 23:29 ISTNo report of casualties, injuries or damage to any property was received following the earthquake Earthquake of magnitude 4.2 hit Gujarat on Friday, November 15. (Representative Image via Shutterstock)An earthquake of magnitude 4.2 hit Gujarat on Friday. The earthquake tremors were felt in major cities, including Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar and Mehsana.According to the Institute of Seismological Research, Gandhinagar, the epicentre of the earthquake lay 13 kilometres south-southwest of Patan in Gujarat’s Banaskantha district.related storiesThe epicenter was located at a depth of 10 km, with coordinates 23.71°N latitude and 72.30°E longitude.Even after the earthquake, no report of casualties, injuries or damage to any property has been received so far.The effect of the earthquake was felt in several areas across North Gujarat and parts of Saurashtra-Kutch, including Mehsana, Banaskantha, Sabarkantha, Ambaji, Disa, Kheralu, Palanpur, Prantij, Talod, Eder, Wadali, Bahucharaji, Satlasana, Harij, Sami and Morbi.Even small desert region of Rapar Taluka in Kutch, including villages like Adesar and Nanda, felt the tremors. Moreover, areas in Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, and Mount Abu also experienced the earthquake’s effects.Location :Gujarat, IndiaFirst Published:November 15, 2024, 23:29 ISTNews india Earthquake Of Magnitude 4.2 Hits Gujarat, Tremors Felt In Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar Article Engineering, Geological Time-domain acceleration-based pulse characterization of 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes Sedef Kocakaplan Sezgin, Ehsan Ahmadi, Mohammad M. Kashani Summary: Two major earthquakes occurred in the Kahramanmaraş region of Türkiye on February 6, 2023, causing casualties and infrastructure damage. The authors characterized the pulse components of the earthquake ground motions using a multi-pulse decomposition method and found that the pulse cumulative energy of the ground motions near the rupture line was more significant for the Pazarcık earthquake, while it was not significant in a specific area and uniformly distributed for the Elbistan earthquake. The dominant pulse periods of both earthquakes were mainly in the range of 0.5-1.5 seconds, and the pulse amplitudes of several ground motions of the Pazarcık earthquake exceeded 0.5g, while all amplitudes of the Elbistan earthquake were below 0.5g. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2024) Article Engineering, Geological Analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between adjacent buildings in a row Shan Jiang, Changhai Zhai, Fuwei Zhang, Ning Ning, Jigang Zhang Summary: This study aims to address the complexity of the law of collision reactions between adjacent buildings. A mathematical model is established using the dimensional analysis method, and the effects of structural layout, oscillator parameters, etc. are considered. The results show that it is dangerous to place a structure with small mass and stiffness outside, while the bilateral impact response leads to a smaller displacement of the middle structure. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2024) Article Engineering, Geological Research on the elastic-plastic displacement response of SDOF systems and post-yield stiffness ratioScan X - Earthquake on Traxsource
Coachella Valley residents weren't able to feel the shaking from yesterday's magnitude-5.2 earthquake that struck roughly 20 miles from Bakersfield. But some of the people who were affected received an early warning from the MyShake mobile app. The app, which is created by the University of California, Berkeley, began development in 2011. The university partners with CalTech and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). They're also funded by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), which allows the MyShake app to be available for free on mobile devices.Richard Allen is the Director for UC Berkeley's Seismology Lab and oversees the MyShake program. He likens the ability to warn people of an earthquake ahead of time to sorcery: "I mean, it's magic. I mean, it's really quite remarkable. That is the reaction that most people have when they get that first alert is they get a notification on their phone.”In reality, a network of sensors from the USGS, called ShakeAlert sensors, detect earthquakes and rapidly notify users as soon as shaking is detected."When an earthquake starts, it starts underground at some point. And so if we have sensors that are closer to the earthquake than an individual user is, we can detect that earthquake before people feel the shaking," Allen explains. Many of the Coachella Valley residents I spoke to today, though, either hadn't heard about the app or were still yet to try it. Allen says the benefits of the MyShake app isn't limited to earthquake alerts; the data that is collected from users' phones helps with research, too. "You're actually contributing to our research efforts to better understand earthquakes in the future. So there's a little bit of giving, a little bit of take and people seem to really appreciate that," Allen says.Regardless of data, though, Allen admits seismologists like himself are unable to predict when the next big earthquake is. Instead, he urges the public to advocate for seismically safe buildings."I fully expect, unfortunately, there will be a major damaging earthquake in California in my lifetime," Allen cautions. "We share that responsibility about thinking about the buildings that we live and work in and pushing to make sure that they are safe, seismically safe. They won't collapse during the course of the earthquake because it's collapsed buildings that kill people. It's not the earthquake, it's the buildings.". Listen to Earthquake by Scan X on Deezer. Earthquake, Earthquake, Earthquake Scan X - Earthquake (Official Remastered Version - FCOM 25) 4:54; SCAN X - EARTHQUAKE - DRY MIX. 5:53; SCAN-X - EARTHQUAKE (Beyonder mix) 7:34; Scan X Earthquake (live 95) 4:04; Scan X - Earthquake (Official Video) 4:01; Scan X – Earthquake (Original) 4:51; Scan X - Earthquake (Original) 5:01; Scan X - Earthquake (Dry Mix)@NewBedfordPD: A confirmed earthquake - Scan
E Sopacı, S Karimzadeh, I Kalogeras, N Theodoulidis, K Konstantinidou, A Ozacar, O Kale, B Margaris (2021). The Samos Island (Aegean Sea) M7.0 Earthquake: Analysis and engineering implications of strong motion data, Bull Earthq. Eng., this issue, in reviewAydin M, Ifantis K (2004) Turkish-Greek Relations: The Security Dilemma in the Aegean. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London UKBook Google Scholar Binici, B, A Yakut, E Canbay, U Akpinar, K Tuncay (2021). Identifying buildings with high collapse risk based on Samos Earthquake damage inventory In İzmir, Bull Earthq. Eng., this issue, in reviewCetin, KO, G Mylonakis, A Sextos, JP Stewart (report coordinators) (2020). Seismological and engineering effects of the M 7.0 Samos Island (Aegean Sea) Earthquake, GEER Report 069, Hellenic Association of Earthquake Engineering, Earthquake Engineering Association of Turkey, Earthquake Foundation of Turkey, Earthquake Engineering Research Institute, Geotechnical Extreme Event Reconnaissance Association, KO AG Papadimitriou, E Metsobio, S Altun, P Pelekis, P Patron, B Unutmaz, E Rovithis, M Akgun, D Eylul, N Klimis, DP Thrakes, AA Gundogan, K Ziotopoulou, A Sezer, D Eylul, C Kıncal, M Ilgaç, G Can, E Çakır, B Soylemez, A Al-Suhaily, A Elsaid, M Zarzour, JP Stewart, G Mylonakis (2021). The role of site effects on elevated seismic demands and corollary structural damage during the October 30 2020, M7.0 Samos Island (Aegean Sea) Earthquake, Bull Earthq. Eng., this issue, in reviewHeraclides A, Çakmak GA (2019) Greece and Turkey in Conflict and Cooperation: From Europeanization to De-Europeanization. Routledge, Taylor and Francis Group, London UKBook Google Scholar Kalligeris, N, V Skanavis, M Charalampakis, N Melis, E Voukouvalas, A Annunziato, C Synolakis (2021). Field survey of the 2020 Samos - Aegean tsunami in the Greek islands, Bull Earthq. Eng., this issue, in reviewKiratzi, A, C Papazachos, A Özacar, A Pinar, C Kkallas, E Sopacı (2021). Characteristics of the 2020 Samos (2000) Open system for earthquake engineering simulationMota de Sá F, Lopes M, Oliveira CS, et al (2018) An expeditious procedure to assess the seismic risk of individual buildings in Lisbon. In: 16th European Conference on Earthquake Engineering. ThessalonikiMota de Sá FV (2016) Seismic Risk: New instruments for analysis and communication. PhD Thesis . Instituto Superior TécnicoMuir-Wood R, Mignan A (2009) A phenomenological reconstruction of the Mw9 November 1st 1755 earthquake source. Geotech Geol Earthq Eng 7:121–146. Google Scholar NERA (2014) Network of European Research Infrastructures for Earthquake Risk Assessment and Mitigation. Grant agreement ID: 262330Oliveira CS, Costa AC (1984) Updating seismic hazard maps. In: 8th WCEEOliveira CS, Costa AC, Sousa ML, Martins A (1997) Estimativa dos Danos Causados por Sismos no Parque Habitacional do Continente Português. Contribuição para a Definição de uma Política de Seguros, Study for the Associação Portuguesa de Seguradores (in portuguese). LisbonOliveira CS, Carvalho EC, Fragoso MR, Vidália M (1998) Regras Gerais de Reabilitação e Reconstrução de Edifícios Correntes Afectados Pela Crise Sísmica do Faial, Pico e S. Jorge Iniciada Pelo Sismo de 9 de Julho de 1998Oliveira CS, Costa AC, Sousa ML (2000) Definition of seismic action in the context of EC-8. Topics for discussion. In: 12th world conference on earthquake engineering. p 2552Oliveira CS, Sigbjörnsson R, Ólafsson S (2004) A comparative study on strong ground motion in two volcanic environments: Azores and Iceland. In: 13th world conference on earthquake engineering. VancouverOliveira CS, Lopes M, Ferreira MA, Pinto C (2023) Preliminary results of a first risk analysis of the Lisbon building stock. (in preparation)Oliveira CS (2013) Studies made since early nineteen ninety in Portugal reducing the seismic risk. In: Vienna Congress on Recent Advances in Earthquake Engineering and Structural DynamicsOSMF (2023) OpenStreetMap. In: OpenStreetMap Foundation. Accessed 8 Jan 2024Pagani M, Monelli D, Weatherill G et al (2014) OpenQuake engine: an open hazard (and risk) software for the global earthquake model. Seismol Res Lett 85(3):692–702. AS (2009) The opportunity of a disaster: the economic impact of the 1755 Lisbon earthquake. J Econ Hist 69:466–499Article Google Scholar Pitilakis K, Crowley H, Kaynia AM, Facilities C (2014) SYNER-G: typologyScan X - Earthquake [F Communications]
Powerful earthquake strikes off the coast of Northern California The tsunami warning issued for parts of the Northern California and Oregon coastlines after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck off the California coast has been canceled. CNN's Chad Myers reports. " data-duration="01:30" data-source-html=" - Source: CNN " data-fave-thumbnails="{"big": { "uri": " }, "small": { "uri": " } }" data-vr-video="false" data-show-html="" data-byline-html="" data-timestamp-html=" Updated 8:27 PM EST, Thu December 5, 2024 " data-check-event-based-preview="" data-is-vertical-video-embed="false" data-network-id="" data-publish-date="2024-12-05T20:07:25.345Z" data-video-section="us" data-canonical-url=" data-branding-key="" data-video-slug="california-earthquake-tsunami-warning-forecast-digvid" data-first-publish-slug="california-earthquake-tsunami-warning-forecast-digvid" data-video-tags="" data-breakpoints="{"video-resource--media-extra-large": 660}" data-display-video-cover="true" data-details="" data-track-zone="live-story-lede" data-sticky-anchor-pos="bottom"> The tsunami warning issued for parts of the Northern California and Oregon coastlines after a 7.0-magnitude earthquake struck off the California coast has been canceled. CNN's Chad Myers reports. " data-check-event-based-preview="" data-network-id="" data-publish-date="2024-12-05T20:07:25.345Z" data-video-section="us" data-canonical-url=" data-branding-key="" data-video-slug="california-earthquake-tsunami-warning-forecast-digvid" data-first-publish-slug="california-earthquake-tsunami-warning-forecast-digvid" data-video-tags=""> Tsunami warning for Oregon and California canceled. Meteorologist explains what happened 01:30 - Source: CNN Tsunami warning for Oregon and California canceled. Meteorologist explains what happened 01:30 • A powerful earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 7.0 struck off the coast of Northern California Thursday morning, according to the US Geological Survey. A quake this strong is relatively rare, with officials reporting only about 15 around the world each year. • A tsunami warning that was issued for parts of California and the Oregon coastline was canceled by the National Tsunami Warning Center after some residents fled their homes. Most significant off-coast quakes prompt such warnings, as experts have little time to determine the immediate risk, and the result of a tsunami could be disastrous. • The quake’s epicenter was in the Pacific Ocean south of Eureka, California, the USGS said. Eureka is the largest coastal city between San Francisco and Portland, Oregon, and about 300 miles northwest of Sacramento. Our live coverage of today’s quake in Northern California has concluded. Please scroll through the post below to learn about today’s developments. Coastal communities in California and Oregon avoided potential disaster when a powerful earthquake in the Pacific Ocean did not ultimately generate a tsunami Thursday. The 7.0-magnitude quake that struck off the coast of Northern California was relatively rare on a global scale: Only about 15 of that strength are measured around the world each year, experts say. The quake is even more rare by California standards. Here’s where it stands among the state’s strongest temblors: A strong earthquake with a preliminary magnitude of 7.0 shook the coast of Northern California on Thursday, triggering a tsunami warning for millions of people. The tsunami warnings have since been canceled, and officials from the US Geological Survey said they have not had reports of landslides or other significant damage. Here’s what we know: The earthquake: The epicenter of the earthquake was around 50 miles southwest of Eureka,Earthquake (Original)Scan X - Last.fm
OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2025) Article Engineering, Geological Parametric analysis on mechanical performance and additional reinforcement design method of reinforced concrete chimneys with openings Zhi-Qian Dong, Gang Li, Song-Ke Zhang, Sha-Yi Wang, Ding-Hao Yu, Zeng-Bo Yao, Chun-Gang Liu, Mei Yang Summary: This study addresses the issue of stress concentration and damage prone to occur around openings in reinforced concrete chimneys under earthquake loads. The stress concentration factor was proposed, and numerical models and pushover analyses were conducted to investigate the effects of parameters such as wall thickness, diameter, opening size, and spacing on stress. Recommendations for limiting opening sizes and a method for designing reinforcing steel bars were presented. Numerical results showed that the proposed method can effectively reduce stress concentration. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2024) Article Engineering, Geological Earthquake-proofing history: seismic assessment of Caserta Vecchia medieval bell tower Elide Nastri, Annachiara D'Apice, Paolo Todisco Summary: This study assesses the seismic response of a bell tower in Italy using photogrammetry and FE modelling. After calibrating the model with AVTs, earthquake intensities were inputted to evaluate the tower's structural performance and potential collapse mechanisms. The results show the vulnerability of the tower under severe earthquakes, highlighting the importance of preservation and the need for conservation strategies. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2025). Listen to Earthquake by Scan X on Deezer. Earthquake, Earthquake, Earthquake Scan X - Earthquake (Official Remastered Version - FCOM 25) 4:54; SCAN X - EARTHQUAKE - DRY MIX. 5:53; SCAN-X - EARTHQUAKE (Beyonder mix) 7:34; Scan X Earthquake (live 95) 4:04; Scan X - Earthquake (Official Video) 4:01; Scan X – Earthquake (Original) 4:51; Scan X - Earthquake (Original) 5:01; Scan X - Earthquake (Dry Mix)SCAN X Earthquake (live 95)
See this visualization first on the Voronoi app.Use This Visualization Mapped: Tectonic Plate Boundaries and Their TypesThis was originally posted on our Voronoi app. Download the app for free on iOS or Android and discover incredible data-driven charts from a variety of trusted sources.Looking at a heat map of where earthquakes have occurred in the last 70 years forms a glowing x-ray of tectonic plate boundaries.Tectonic plates—or massive moving slabs of rock—fit together like puzzle pieces, making up the lithosphere or the upper crust of the Earth. In the map above, we take a look at the types of boundaries based on research from the U.S. Geological Survey (USGS).There are three major ones, as summarized below.The Three Types of Plate BoundariesDivergent boundaries occur when two tectonic plates are moving away from each other. As a result, they can create new valleys and oceanic crust, sometimes resulting in volcanoes.The Arabian and African plate have a divergent boundary and caused the 1995 earthquake (magnitude 7.1 on the Richter scale) near the Gulf of Aqaba. Tectonic Plate BoundaryExamples of TectonicPlates BoundariesEarthquakes Caused ⬅️ ➡️ DivergentNorth American &Eurasian Plate /Arabian & AfricanPlate (Red Sea)1995 Gulf ofAqaba Earthquake ➡️ ⬅️ ConvergentIndian & EurasianPlate / Pacific & NorthAmerican Plate2011 Japan Earthquake 🔄 TransformPacific & NorthAmerican Plate / Arabian &Eurasian Plate2023 Türkiye EarthquakeMeanwhile, convergent boundaries are areas where two tectonic plates move towards each other. This leads either to collision and the Earth’s crust is pushed upwards, often leading to the formation of mountains, like the Himalayas.Or subduction occurs, where one plate moves beneath the other. Subduction has caused some of the most devastating earthquakes in modern history. This includes the 1960 Valdivia Earthquake, the 2004 Indian Ocean Earthquake, and the 2011 Japan Earthquake. The expected earthquake in the Pacific, colloquially called “The Big One” will occurComments
Last Updated:November 15, 2024, 23:29 ISTNo report of casualties, injuries or damage to any property was received following the earthquake Earthquake of magnitude 4.2 hit Gujarat on Friday, November 15. (Representative Image via Shutterstock)An earthquake of magnitude 4.2 hit Gujarat on Friday. The earthquake tremors were felt in major cities, including Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar and Mehsana.According to the Institute of Seismological Research, Gandhinagar, the epicentre of the earthquake lay 13 kilometres south-southwest of Patan in Gujarat’s Banaskantha district.related storiesThe epicenter was located at a depth of 10 km, with coordinates 23.71°N latitude and 72.30°E longitude.Even after the earthquake, no report of casualties, injuries or damage to any property has been received so far.The effect of the earthquake was felt in several areas across North Gujarat and parts of Saurashtra-Kutch, including Mehsana, Banaskantha, Sabarkantha, Ambaji, Disa, Kheralu, Palanpur, Prantij, Talod, Eder, Wadali, Bahucharaji, Satlasana, Harij, Sami and Morbi.Even small desert region of Rapar Taluka in Kutch, including villages like Adesar and Nanda, felt the tremors. Moreover, areas in Gandhinagar, Ahmedabad, and Mount Abu also experienced the earthquake’s effects.Location :Gujarat, IndiaFirst Published:November 15, 2024, 23:29 ISTNews india Earthquake Of Magnitude 4.2 Hits Gujarat, Tremors Felt In Ahmedabad, Gandhinagar
2025-03-29Article Engineering, Geological Time-domain acceleration-based pulse characterization of 2023 Kahramanmaraş earthquakes Sedef Kocakaplan Sezgin, Ehsan Ahmadi, Mohammad M. Kashani Summary: Two major earthquakes occurred in the Kahramanmaraş region of Türkiye on February 6, 2023, causing casualties and infrastructure damage. The authors characterized the pulse components of the earthquake ground motions using a multi-pulse decomposition method and found that the pulse cumulative energy of the ground motions near the rupture line was more significant for the Pazarcık earthquake, while it was not significant in a specific area and uniformly distributed for the Elbistan earthquake. The dominant pulse periods of both earthquakes were mainly in the range of 0.5-1.5 seconds, and the pulse amplitudes of several ground motions of the Pazarcık earthquake exceeded 0.5g, while all amplitudes of the Elbistan earthquake were below 0.5g. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2024) Article Engineering, Geological Analysis of earthquake-induced pounding between adjacent buildings in a row Shan Jiang, Changhai Zhai, Fuwei Zhang, Ning Ning, Jigang Zhang Summary: This study aims to address the complexity of the law of collision reactions between adjacent buildings. A mathematical model is established using the dimensional analysis method, and the effects of structural layout, oscillator parameters, etc. are considered. The results show that it is dangerous to place a structure with small mass and stiffness outside, while the bilateral impact response leads to a smaller displacement of the middle structure. BULLETIN OF EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING (2024) Article Engineering, Geological Research on the elastic-plastic displacement response of SDOF systems and post-yield stiffness ratio
2025-04-10Coachella Valley residents weren't able to feel the shaking from yesterday's magnitude-5.2 earthquake that struck roughly 20 miles from Bakersfield. But some of the people who were affected received an early warning from the MyShake mobile app. The app, which is created by the University of California, Berkeley, began development in 2011. The university partners with CalTech and the United States Geological Survey (USGS). They're also funded by the California Governor's Office of Emergency Services (Cal OES), which allows the MyShake app to be available for free on mobile devices.Richard Allen is the Director for UC Berkeley's Seismology Lab and oversees the MyShake program. He likens the ability to warn people of an earthquake ahead of time to sorcery: "I mean, it's magic. I mean, it's really quite remarkable. That is the reaction that most people have when they get that first alert is they get a notification on their phone.”In reality, a network of sensors from the USGS, called ShakeAlert sensors, detect earthquakes and rapidly notify users as soon as shaking is detected."When an earthquake starts, it starts underground at some point. And so if we have sensors that are closer to the earthquake than an individual user is, we can detect that earthquake before people feel the shaking," Allen explains. Many of the Coachella Valley residents I spoke to today, though, either hadn't heard about the app or were still yet to try it. Allen says the benefits of the MyShake app isn't limited to earthquake alerts; the data that is collected from users' phones helps with research, too. "You're actually contributing to our research efforts to better understand earthquakes in the future. So there's a little bit of giving, a little bit of take and people seem to really appreciate that," Allen says.Regardless of data, though, Allen admits seismologists like himself are unable to predict when the next big earthquake is. Instead, he urges the public to advocate for seismically safe buildings."I fully expect, unfortunately, there will be a major damaging earthquake in California in my lifetime," Allen cautions. "We share that responsibility about thinking about the buildings that we live and work in and pushing to make sure that they are safe, seismically safe. They won't collapse during the course of the earthquake because it's collapsed buildings that kill people. It's not the earthquake, it's the buildings."
2025-04-17